Earth Overshoot Day shows urgent need for sustainable living

Every year, humanity reaches Earth Overshoot Day, the point when the year’s planetary budget is spent. This marks how quickly we use resources compared to Earth’s ability to renew them.

In 2025, Denmark’s Earth Overshoot Day arrived on March 19, one of the earliest in the world. If everyone lived like the average Dane, more than four Earths would be required to sustain humanity.

This reality raises an urgent question: Which daily choices matter most?

Researchers at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) tackled this question by linking everyday activities with the Planetary Boundaries framework.

Their findings help separate symbolic actions from those that truly bring us closer to a sustainable future.

Measuring true environmental impact

“One problem is that it’s hard for people to distinguish between what is better for the environment and what is good enough,” said Teddy Serrano, Ph.D. at DTU.

“If you get a three out of 10, it’s better than a two out of 10, but it’s still a bad grade. So the question is: When can we say that the grade is good enough?”

To address this, the researchers created annual environmental budgets for individuals by downscaling global limits on an equal per capita basis.

Six categories were used: climate change, functional biodiversity, land occupation, marine eutrophication, resource use, and water consumption.

Each lifestyle choice was compared to these budgets, showing how much of the yearly allowance it consumed.

Food choices shape planet

Food emerged as the single largest driver of environmental pressure. An omnivorous diet overshoots climate, biodiversity, and land budgets all by itself. By contrast, vegetarian and vegan diets dramatically cut these impacts.

A vegan diet uses only 22 percent of the climate allowance, while a vegetarian one consumes around 33 percent.

Replacing cow’s milk with oat milk also shrinks biodiversity and land pressures from substantial portions of the allowance to near negligible values.

Commuting and climate costs

Mobility choices carry similar weight. Driving a gasoline or diesel car for daily distances can use up the entire climate budget in a single year.

Small electric cars reduce this to about half, but increase demand for mineral resources due to batteries.

Commuting by e-bike, however, lowers climate impacts to just 5 percent of the allowance.

Air travel remains especially damaging, with a single round trip across the Atlantic consuming as much as three-quarters of a person’s yearly climate budget.

Homes and climate strain

Housing adds further strain. Building and living in a detached home overshoots the resource budget entirely.

Heating with oil takes up more than 80 percent of the climate allowance, while switching to heat pumps reduces that figure dramatically.

Adding solar panels improves results across categories, cutting climate impacts from double-digit percentages to much lower shares of the budget.

Misconceptions about small actions

Not all popular changes have meaningful effects. Using reusable grocery bags or washing clothes at lower temperatures only shifts results by a small fraction.

While such actions may save money or offer convenience, they cannot bridge the vast gap between current lifestyles and sustainable living.

The study highlights that attention must be placed on high-impact areas such as food, transport, housing, and aviation.

Action beyond Overshoot Day

The researchers also stress that personal effort alone cannot fully align lifestyles with planetary limits.

Systemic change is equally important, including cleaner energy systems, improved public transportation, and policies that support smaller, less resource-intensive homes.

“Our study draws attention to the fact that we need to make major shifts in our current lifestyles if we want to bring our impact on the environment down to sustainable levels,” Serrano notes.

A framework for change

To make these priorities clear, the study points to four key lifestyle areas. Planes highlight the outsized impact of air travel, where even a single long-haul trip can consume most of a climate budget.

Places highlight the importance of housing size, with smaller homes requiring fewer materials and less energy.

Plates capture the significance of diet, with plant-based foods offering huge reductions. Pedals remind us that choosing cycling first keeps transportation within a manageable footprint.

Sustainable path on Overshoot Day

The evidence shows that not all actions are equal. Minor lifestyle gestures cannot outweigh the large impacts of cars, planes, meat-heavy diets, and oversized housing.

To live within planetary boundaries, individuals and societies alike must prioritize high-impact changes.

By combining informed personal decisions with systemic support, humanity can move closer to a balance that one Earth can sustain.

The study is published in the journal Sustainable Production and Consumption.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–