Recognizing different giraffe species is crucial for conservation

Giraffes are instantly recognizable with their tall necks, patterned coats, and slow strides across African plains. For a long time, scientists believed they were all one species. New research shows that’s not the case.

A detailed analysis shows that giraffes aren’t one single group, but four separate species. This discovery reshapes conservation and forces a fresh look at Africa’s most iconic animal.

Discovery of four giraffe species

After years of genetic analysis, researchers have identified four distinct giraffe species. These include Northern giraffes, reticulated giraffes, Masai giraffes, and Southern giraffes.

Michael Brown from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) explained why the split matters.

“Each species has different population sizes, threats and conservation needs,” said Brown. “When you lump giraffes all together, it muddies the narrative.”

Giraffes face various threats

Northern and Masai giraffes face very different pressures. Northern giraffes live in South Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Central African Republic, where conflict and poaching continue to shrink their populations.

Masai giraffes in Kenya and Tanzania confront another problem – rapid habitat loss. Expanding farms and cattle grazing steadily replace open savannas, leaving less room for giraffes to roam.

These contrasting threats highlight why conservation cannot treat all giraffes as one group.

Unique conservation needs of giraffes

Each species lives in unique conditions, shaped by political, social, and environmental factors, and each requires tailored strategies to prevent further decline and secure its future in the wild.

In Uganda’s Kidepo Valley National Park, Northern giraffes show just how fragile the situation has become.

Stuart Pimm, an ecologist from Duke University, praised the new classification. “Considering four giraffe species is absolutely the right decision, and it’s long overdue,” he said.

Modern science reveals differences

Old studies focused on the giraffe’s coat. Spots seemed like a clue, but they were not considered strong enough evidence to define multiple species.

In more recent studies, researchers used genetic sequencing and skull comparisons to find differences. Even the giraffe’s bony head protrusions, often mistaken for horns, carry distinctions.

The task force behind the current study argued that taxonomy is never just academic. It shapes how funds get used, how laws protect animals, and how people understand risk. Getting the classification wrong means protecting the wrong populations.

Genetics reshape giraffe conservation

Stephanie Fennessy from the Giraffe Conservation Foundation highlighted how falling sequencing costs transformed giraffe research. Two decades ago, analyzing a single genome cost tens of thousands of dollars, making large-scale studies nearly impossible.

Today, the cost is around $100, a dramatic drop that opened access for nonprofit groups and conservationists.

With this affordability, researchers gathered over 2,000 genetic samples from giraffes across Africa, building a vast dataset that reshaped understanding of giraffe diversity. But the assessment emphasized that genetics alone cannot carry the burden of taxonomy.

Strong conclusions need multiple forms of evidence. Anatomy, such as skull differences, and ecological patterns, like habitat ranges, must align with genetic data to build a reliable picture. If classifications depend only on one source, conservation planning risks misdirection.

By combining disciplines, scientists ensure that strategies reflect reality, giving giraffes a better chance at survival in an increasingly pressured environment.

Population counts show urgency

Population counts reveal the stakes. Northern giraffes are the scarcest, with around 7,000 left. “It’s one of the most threatened large mammals in the world,” said Fennessy.

Reticulated giraffes number around 21,000, while Masai giraffes total nearly 44,000. Southern giraffes have the strongest population, with about 69,000 individuals remaining.

These numbers show why the new classification matters. Without separating species, losses in one group hide behind stability in another. With clarity, strategies can actually match the dangers each group faces.

Protecting giraffes individually

The story of giraffes and their conservation is no longer simple. “If not all giraffes are the same, then we have to protect them individually,” said Fennessy.

A change in perspective could determine giraffes’ future in Africa – either remaining a familiar presence or vanishing from the wild.

Science now provides conservationists with stronger tools to act. The pressing challenge is simple yet urgent: will these tools be applied effectively before it becomes too late?

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–